So your AI just generated 200 lines of code and... nothing works. The console is screaming at you. The UI is blank. Or worse—it looks fine but crashes the moment a user clicks anything.
Welcome to the club.
Here's the thing nobody tells you about vibe coding: AI-generated code breaks. A lot. Y Combinator recently reported that 25% of their Winter 2025 startups have codebases that are 95% AI-generated. That's wild. But it also means debugging AI code isn't optional anymore—it's the most valuable skill you can have.
Key Takeaways:
- Most AI code errors fall into 5 predictable categories (and have equally predictable fixes)
- The "error-forward" technique—feeding errors back to AI—fixes 80% of issues instantly
- Prevention beats debugging: specific prompts generate cleaner code from the start
In This Article
- Why AI Code Breaks (It's Not What You Think)
- The 5 Most Common AI Code Errors
- Quick Fix Prompts You Can Copy Right Now
- The Error-Forward Technique
- When to Debug Manually vs. Ask AI
- Prevention: Write Prompts That Generate Clean Code
- Pre-Ship Checklist
- FAQ
Try this prompt⌘+Enterto launch
Why AI Code Breaks (It's Not What You Think)
Here's my hot take: AI doesn't write bad code because it's dumb. It writes bad code because you gave it incomplete context.
Think about it. When you ask a junior developer to "build a navbar," what do you get? Probably something functional but weird. Wrong colors. Missing mobile menu. Doesn't match your existing code style.
AI is the same. It's filling in blanks you never specified.
The most common reason AI code breaks:
- Missing imports (AI assumes you have packages you don't)
- Wrong framework assumptions (generates Next.js code for a Vite project)
- Outdated patterns (uses deprecated APIs)
- Incomplete state management (works in isolation, breaks in context)
If you're serious about vibe coding best practices, understanding why code breaks is half the battle.
The 5 Most Common AI Code Errors
After debugging hundreds of AI-generated components, I've noticed the same errors show up constantly. Here's what you'll hit and how to recognize them:
| Error Type | What You'll See | Root Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Import Errors | Module not found or is not defined | AI assumed a library was installed |
| Type Errors | undefined is not an object | AI used properties that don't exist |
| React State Bugs | Component doesn't re-render | Missing state updates or wrong dependencies |
| Styling Breaks | Works on desktop, dies on mobile | No responsive classes added |
| Event Handler Fails | Clicks do nothing | Wrong function syntax or missing binding |
Let me break down each one.
1. Import Errors (The Classic)
AI loves suggesting packages you don't have. You'll see:
Module not found: Can't resolve 'framer-motion'
Fix: Check the imports at the top of the file. Either install the package (npm install framer-motion) or ask AI to rewrite without external dependencies.
2. Type Errors (The Sneaky One)
Your component loads, then crashes when you interact with it:
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')
Fix: The data structure AI expected doesn't match reality. This usually happens when AI assumes your API returns an array but you're getting null initially.
3. React State Bugs
The button clicks but nothing happens. No error. Just... nothing.
This is the most frustrating bug because React won't yell at you. The issue is usually in useEffect dependencies or state not updating immutably.
4. Styling Breaks on Mobile
Looks pixel-perfect on your MacBook. Open it on your phone? Total disaster.
AI often forgets responsive classes. Look for missing md:, lg:, or sm: prefixes in Tailwind code. This is a common vibe coding mistake that's easy to miss.
5. Event Handlers That Do Nothing
You click a button. Nothing happens. Console is clean.
Usually it's one of these:
onClick={handleClick()}instead ofonClick={handleClick}(function called immediately)- Handler defined but never passed down as prop
- Async function without proper error handling (fails silently)
Quick Fix Prompts You Can Copy Right Now
Stop staring at broken code. Copy these prompts, paste your error, and let AI fix its own mess.
The Universal Debug Prompt
Want to try this yourself?
Try this prompt⌘+Enterto launch
The "Why Doesn't This Render" Prompt
The Mobile Fix Prompt
The "Remove Dependencies" Prompt
The Error-Forward Technique
This is the hill I'll die on: the error-forward technique fixes 80% of AI code bugs.
Here's how it works:
Instead of trying to understand the error yourself, you:
- Copy the exact error message
- Copy the relevant code
- Ask AI: "Fix this error: [error]. Code: [code]"
- Run the fixed code
- Repeat if needed
It sounds dumb. It works incredibly well.
The key is giving AI complete context. Don't just paste the error—include the full component, your browser console output, and describe what you were trying to do. The more context engineering you do, the better your fixes.
When Error-Forward Fails
Sometimes you'll hit a loop where AI keeps generating the same broken fix. That's your signal to:
- Try a different phrasing
- Break the problem into smaller pieces
- Debug manually (see next section)
When to Debug Manually vs. Ask AI
Real talk: AI isn't always the answer. Here's my framework:
| Situation | AI Fix | Manual Debug |
|---|---|---|
| Import error | Yes - quick | |
| Typo or syntax | Yes | |
| Logic bug | Maybe | If AI loops |
| Performance issue | Yes - always | |
| Security vulnerability | Yes - never trust AI | |
| Styling tweaks | Your call | Often faster manually |
Always debug manually for:
- Authentication or security code (check the security checklist)
- Performance optimization
- Anything touching user data
- Complex state logic where you need to understand the flow
Let AI fix:
- Import errors
- Basic syntax mistakes
- Missing null checks
- Adding responsive classes
Prevention: Write Prompts That Generate Clean Code
The best debugging strategy? Don't generate buggy code in the first place.
Here's what actually reduces errors:
Be Specific About Your Stack
Bad: "Create a navbar"
Good: "Create a responsive navbar using React 18, Tailwind CSS v3, and TypeScript. No external component libraries. Include mobile hamburger menu with useState toggle."
Specify Error Handling Upfront
Add to your prompts:
- "Include null checks for all data"
- "Add loading and error states"
- "Handle empty arrays gracefully"
Request the Right Output Format
"Generate only the component code. Include all imports at the top. Use TypeScript interfaces for all props."
Provide Example Data
Don't let AI guess your data structure:
If you're just getting started with vibe coding, these habits will save you hours. Check out our beginner's guide for more foundational techniques.
Pre-Ship Checklist
Before you deploy any AI-generated code, run through this:
- Build passes - No TypeScript or compilation errors
- Console is clean - No warnings or errors in dev tools
- Mobile test - Actually open it on a phone
- Click everything - Every button, link, and interactive element
- Empty states - What happens with no data?
- Edge cases - Very long text, special characters, missing images
- Security review - Especially for forms and auth flows
This isn't just paranoia. AI-generated code often works in happy-path demos and explodes in production. Five minutes of testing saves hours of debugging live issues.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I fix AI generated code that keeps breaking?
Use the error-forward technique: copy the exact error message and relevant code, then feed it back to your AI tool with context. Most errors fix themselves when AI understands the full picture. If you're stuck in a loop, break the problem into smaller pieces or debug manually.
Why does AI generated code have so many bugs?
AI fills in gaps based on assumptions. When you don't specify your framework version, installed packages, or data structure, AI guesses—and often guesses wrong. More specific prompts with explicit constraints generate cleaner code.
Is it faster to debug AI code or rewrite from scratch?
For small bugs (imports, typos, null checks), debugging is faster. For fundamental architectural issues or completely wrong approaches, regenerating with a better prompt often saves time. If you've fed the error back twice and it's still broken, consider starting fresh.
Can AI fix its own code?
Yes, and it's surprisingly good at it. The error-forward technique leverages this: AI can often identify and fix bugs in code it generated when given the error message and context. Think of it as a revision cycle, not a one-shot generation.
You Might Also Like
- Vibe Coding Best Practices for 2025 - Build better habits before bugs happen
- 10 Vibe Coding Mistakes That Kill Projects - Avoid these common traps
- Context Engineering Guide - Get better AI outputs through better context
Written by the Fardino Team. We build AI tools for frontend developers. Build with Fardino →
<!-- SCHEMA_DATA { "article": { "@type": "Article", "headline": "Fix AI-Generated Code Errors (Actually Works)", "description": "Your AI just spit out broken code. Again. Here's how to fix it in 60 seconds without losing your mind.", "author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Fardino", "url": "https://fardino.com" }, "datePublished": "2025-12-15", "dateModified": "2025-12-15" }, "faq": [ { "question": "How do I fix AI generated code that keeps breaking?", "answer": "Use the error-forward technique: copy the exact error message and relevant code, then feed it back to your AI tool with context. Most errors fix themselves when AI understands the full picture. If you're stuck in a loop, break the problem into smaller pieces or debug manually." }, { "question": "Why does AI generated code have so many bugs?", "answer": "AI fills in gaps based on assumptions. When you don't specify your framework version, installed packages, or data structure, AI guesses—and often guesses wrong. More specific prompts with explicit constraints generate cleaner code." }, { "question": "Is it faster to debug AI code or rewrite from scratch?", "answer": "For small bugs (imports, typos, null checks), debugging is faster. For fundamental architectural issues or completely wrong approaches, regenerating with a better prompt often saves time. If you've fed the error back twice and it's still broken, consider starting fresh." }, { "question": "Can AI fix its own code?", "answer": "Yes, and it's surprisingly good at it. The error-forward technique leverages this: AI can often identify and fix bugs in code it generated when given the error message and context. Think of it as a revision cycle, not a one-shot generation." } ], "howto": { "name": "How to Fix AI-Generated Code Errors", "steps": [ {"name": "Identify the error type", "text": "Check the console for error messages. Most errors fall into 5 categories: import errors, type errors, state bugs, styling breaks, or event handler failures."}, {"name": "Copy the error and code", "text": "Copy the exact error message from your console and the relevant code that's causing the issue."}, {"name": "Feed error back to AI", "text": "Use the error-forward technique: paste your error and code into AI with the prompt 'Fix this error and explain what caused it.'"}, {"name": "Test the fix", "text": "Run the corrected code. If it still fails, repeat the process or debug manually."}, {"name": "Run pre-ship checklist", "text": "Before deploying, test on mobile, click all interactive elements, and check for edge cases."} ] }, "breadcrumb": ["Home", "Blog", "Tips & Tricks", "Fix AI-Generated Code Errors (Actually Works)"] } SCHEMA_DATA -->
